Echoes of Artur Domosławski’s biography Kapuściński non-fiction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33604/sl.18.34.7Keywords:
Artur Domosławski, biography, literary reportage, cultural and genealogical dispute, Ryszard KapuścińskiAbstract
In 2010, Polish journalist and reporter Artur Domosławski started a long-‑running dispute in the Polish national media by publishing a biography about his mentor and friend Ryszard Kapuściński. In this article, selected fragments of both sides of the aforementioned dispute are presented as an argument for the thesis that one of the outcomes of the debate surrounding the biography Kapuściński non-fiction in the Polish public discourse was the need to reflect on two important and interconnected issues. Firstly, the alleged controversies were interpreted as a kind of a cultural phenomenon, in the centre of which was the demystification of Kapuściński as a great national figure and infallible reporter. Harsh criticism and tendentious remarks regarding Domosławski’s allegedly controversial text were analysed in the context of the Polish national need to mystify and heroise the figure of Ryszard Kapuściński, i.e. to maintain the so-called »gilding« on the monument of an unquestionably great and important author. Consequently, the article argues that the revisionist aim of Domosławski’s book was to reflect on the rules by which contemporary Polish biographers are guided, especially taking into account their tendency of approaching certain public figures in uncritical and biased manner. While some believe that Domosławski in some way revolutionised Polish biography and extended the authority of the biographer himself, others claim that he abused his role and broke the rules of biographical writing. Secondly, an attempt was made to show how Domosławski, by analysing Kapuściński’s specific poetics in his biography, contributed to an already existing polemic about Polish literary reportage and its duality between fictional and factual discourse. The fact that the Kapuściński non-fiction dispute gave rise to two opposing sides can also be understood as the existence of two separate schools of thought when it comes to the »craft« of writing literary reportage, a form that has, due to Kapuściński, been moved from the strictly journalistic domain into the realm of literature.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Studia lexicographica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for papers published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal (this applies to both print and electronic issue). Papers in the journal are licensed under the Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY), which permits users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as to remix, transform and build upon material in educational and other settings, provided that the credit is given to the author and that the original work is properly cited. Complete legal background of license is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. It is the author’s responsibility to obtain permission to reproduce material from other sources. They also bear full responsibility in any cases of copyright infringement.
Copyright for papers published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal (this applies to both print and electronic issue). Papers in the journal are licensed under the Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY), which permits users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as to remix, transform and build upon material in educational and other settings, provided that the credit is given to the author and that the original work is properly cited. Complete legal background of license is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. It is the author’s responsibility to obtain permission to reproduce material from other sources. They also bear full responsibility in any cases of copyright infringement.